The Nike Zoom Kobe VII Supreme System – Black Lotus Performance Reviews
Introduction
This year, the Zoom Kobe series takes a step in a new direction, with an attempt to push the technology and features of the shoe to new limits. Last week, our First Look uncovered an interchangeable midsole “System” offering two options. The Play Strong midsole is equipped with a Cushlon base for cushioning and a high ankle sleeve, while the Play Fast option continues the Zoom forefoot and heel set up, with a standard low cut sleeve for support. With all the hoopla and hype surrounding each Kobe release, our Performance Review puts the Nike Zoom Kobe VII Supreme System to the test.
Comfort and Fit
With either the Play Fast or Strong midsole inserted, the comfortable stretch material holds the foot tight. The sleeve holds so well that the one would be able to walk with just the midsoles (although this is not recommended). Tightening the laces, the stiff and rigid upper comes close coinciding with the snug and tight fit of the midsole sleeve. For sizing, the Kobe VII is true to size with little wiggle room anywhere, including the toe box. Ankle support is provided by the Play Strong midsole, as the velcro strap serves similar to a light ankle brace. And even though the stretch material is on the thin side, the ankle brace does have a cumbersome feel. At the rear, lockdown is a bit slippery, more so felt again with the Play Strong midsole, due to the fact that the silky stretch sleeve runs down the Achilles to the heel. Another factor contributing to the lack of lock down is the foam side wall extending up the heel (for both midsoles), which keeps the heel from sitting flush on the counter. Moving to the cushioning set up, both soles are relatively flat and are on the stiff side. The difference between the two is that the Play Fast midsole has a lower profile, especially at the forefoot, while the Play Strong sole is thicker with a more consistent feel. Around the sides of each sole, a thin flap of the foam extends up forming a side wall, which provides some arch support, but also brings a rough feel around the foot. Both set ups, however, do have a very responsive feel. Evaluating comfort and fit, the Supreme System is snug, rigid, and rough with light ankle support (Play Strong midsole).
Performance
Not uncommon for any sneaker, a break in period is necessary for optimal performance to be observed. However, because of the midsole set up, the break in period involves not only working the upper in, but also easing the stiff foam in. Once broken in, it is very clear what type of playing style the shoe is geared for – aggressive and fast. First and foremost, our performance review will cover the Play Strong midsole, as it is a bit more versatile. The main difference between the soles, as both are very responsive, includes a lower profile and a bit more freedom of movement (due to the lack of an ankle sleeve) for the Play Fast midsole. To start, running is a bit stiff all around, as the flat outsole is not really geared for fluid heel to toe transitions. Lateral movement, on the other hand, is exceptional and is where the light weight of the shoe is most noticeable. Staying in front of an offensive player, the shoe allows the player to slide each way, with the great medial and lateral support felt. Putting the outrigger to work, jab steps, quick baseline pull ups, and an explosive first step are best performed hard and aggressive. And because of the responsive set up, deciding to change directions mid move is not a problem. Jumping and finishing at the hole, like previous Kobe models, is aided by the light weight of the shoe, with the Cushlon or Zoom cushioning taking the impact on the hard side. Perhaps the most surprising aspect in performance is with post play. Due to the responsive cushioning, flat sole, and ankle support, the shoe has some advantages working down low. Working a player down, the player can push down hard on either midsole, and a strong or spin finish can be performed explosively. In all, the performance of the Kobe VII is fit for the fast and aggressive player.
In the stability department, the Kobe VII performs very well. The ankle sleeve, provides comfortable support, and is a good option for those who prefer a low cut, but need some ankle support. However, the addition of the ankle sleeve does leave some room for improvement in terms of integration and overall protection. Moving on, the upper and sleeve offer both protection and hold for the foot. The foot is always held in place, with very little movement aside from some light heel slippage. Even more solid that the upper and sleeve is the very stiff foundation. Made for the aggressive player, performing movements and tasks that push the shoe to the limits are handled naturally. Whether it is the outrigger being pressed down hard or the mid foot plate holding strong, stability of the Kobe VII is stellar from top to bottom.
Flat on the court, the outsole provides exceptional traction. Court grip is even throughout, with the herringbone section on the medial side providing a bit more grip, especially evident while making aggressive cuts to the basket. The shard traction pattern also grips well, helping the player stop laterally even on a court that may have a slight film of dust. With the responsiveness of each midsole set up, and the flat design of the outsole, players looking for good grip will find traction performance favorable. In the ventilation department, there are very little problems. The sleeve on both midsoles do grip tight, but are designed keep the foot comfortable. That said, the foot stays comfortably dry for those long late night runs on the court.
Conclusion
Much like the Air Jordan 2011, the interchangeable midsole concept does come with a few pitfalls. For the Kobe VII, it seems as though the overall fluidness and comfort of the shoe has been affected. An although the ankle sleeve is welcomed, the integration in performance is jagged even though it does address one of the lacking performance aspects of the line in recent years. However, the both cushioning options, offer responsive performance, and those needing for a low cut aggressive performer with good traction can look to the Kobe VII as an option. Looking ahead, Kobe Bryant and the design team at Nike have always looked to push the limits of technology and style with the Zoom Kobe series. The sneaker industry saw the Zoom Kobe IV as a breakthrough in low cut performance, but it seems as though subsequent models have done little to expand on the line. With the ever changing basketball sneaker landscape welcoming new companies, and established brands developing high quality performers as each season passes, the performance of the Zoom Kobe series looks only to be catering, first to Kobe Bryant fans, and second to those who prefer a low cut performer, rather than overall versatility and high performance on the court. In any case, the Nike Zoom Kobe VII Supreme System is available now at the Official Nike Online Store.
This shoe is comparable to:
Air Jordan 2011
Nike Zoom Kobe VI
Print article | This entry was posted by Mishra on January 15, 2012 at 9:00 pm, and is filed under Reviews. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 9 years ago
Great review as always Mishra! But, you sound disappointed from the get go. I am disappointed too… I was looking forward to possibly buying these. I understand why Kobe is the only one playing in them now and why most ppl stuck with the VI. So did the ankle strap not seem to provide any real support for the ankles? And which insole provided a better cushioning platform?
about 9 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site and for the kind words! For all of our reviews, we go into our evaluations with no expectations, but we do try to paint a picture with a short summary/history of the shoe and where the shoe/line currently stands in the industry. With the Zoom Kobe, the line is at the forefront of Nike Basketball, so we like to point that out. That said, our expectations going into the evaluation process were the same as lesser publicized or promoted sneakers, with an example being the Reebok Thermal Vibe. To your questions, the ankle brace is very comfortable and does provide some support, but the integration into the design of the shoe seemed a bit forced. We did however feel that the cushioning set up on the Play Strong midsole offered a bit more responsiveness than the Play Fast, but in the end, it is all up to player preference.
about 9 years ago
As Always Another Great Review , Wanna ask if you would rate this higher than any Drose shoe ?
about 9 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site and adding your comments! We would rate the released Adidas adiZero™ Rose 1, 1.5, and 2 ahead of this version of the Zoom Kobe.
about 9 years ago
Glad to see you are not biased towards nike unlike many shoeheads out there
about 9 years ago
Ya,true.
about 9 years ago
Great Review, how do these compare to the Under Armour Bloodline?
about 9 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! Compared to the Under Armour Micro G® Bloodline, the Zoom Kobe VII has stickier traction and is a bit more responsive. The Bloodline is more comfortable, and performance is fluid.
about 9 years ago
Hi! I just wanna ask if it is really uncomfortable and some reviews say that you will have blisters. Thanks!
about 9 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! There are some rough spots around the midsole side wall that can rub against the foot. Blisters can be a result. Any shoe can cause blisters, and it always depends on the size and shape of the foot. Hope this helps!
about 9 years ago
Impressive as always with the up to date and greatly detailed reviews!
I have some questions for you.
1)Does heel-toe transition have the same not so fluid feel on both setups? I am saying this since the fast one has a Phylon base and the strong one a Cushlon base.
2) If you compared the heel lockdown and H-toe transition on the ZKV -ZKVI and the ZKVII would you put on top the ZKV?
3) I happen to be an owner of the previous models and I surely noticed a better lockdown on the ZKV. What would be your rank among these 3 models performance wise(preference)?
Thanks!
about 9 years ago
Thanks for the support and the positive words! To answer your questions, (1) The foam used did play a factor in the lack of fluid heel to toe transition, but we attribute that to the fact that the sleeve is connected to the midsole (it feels as though you are dragging the sole at times) and that the outsole surface is on the flat side, (2) As far as heel lock down and transitions, we would rate the V highest, then VII and VI, (3) As far as overall performance we would rank as follows – VII, V, VI. Hope this helps!
about 9 years ago
just a clarification. VI > V > VII? or is it the other way around?
about 9 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! It is the other way around, so – VII > V > VI
about 9 years ago
i see. from the review i would assume that the VIs are better than the VIIs. anyway, glad you cleared them up
about 9 years ago
Can you include the Kobe IV to this rating and what is making the Kobe VI, the worst Performer, out of these 4? Thanks!
about 9 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! The Zoom Kobe IV would rate ahead of the V, VI, and VII. In a few words, we would rate the VI below the other three for the fact that the others simply out perform the VI on the court. The IV has brings better traction and ankle support, while the V has a glove like fit with some ankle support, and the VII again brings better traction and more responsiveness. Hope this helps!
about 9 years ago
Which current Low-Top(s) do you recommend/rate over the Kobe VII? Thanks.
about 8 years ago
Thanks for the comments! There are not very many true low cut shoes on the market, but one in particular would be the Under Armour Micro G® Bloodline. Hope this helps!
about 9 years ago
Fantastic review as always. Sticking with the lightweight theme, do you have plans to review the Adidas adizero Shadow?
about 9 years ago
Thanks for the comments! At this time we have no plans to review the Adidas adiZero™ Shadow.
about 9 years ago
how do these compare to the adidas adizero 2.0
about 9 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! In a few words, the Kobe VII is a more traditional low cut shoe and is a bit stiffer than the Adidas adiZero™ Rose 2. The Rose 2 is a better overall performer in many aspects, although the Kobe VII may have a slight edge in court grip. Hope this helps!
about 9 years ago
and are you guy reviewing his new shoes the adidas adizero rose 2.5(formally known as Dominate)
about 9 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! Yes we will have a Performance Review of the Adidas adiZero™ Rose 2.5 coming soon! Be on the look out for it!
about 9 years ago
i really thought that the removable midsole was going to cause some critical flaws since the first time i saw the shoe’s construction. good thing you were able to point out those flaws, and then some. what do you think about the shoes’ durability? how would you rank these in an overall basis with the LB9, KD4, and sweep thru?
about 9 years ago
Thanks for the comments! For our evaluation, we did not test durability, but with the interchangeable midsoles, there might be some problems. The upper casing should be solid, but the inside lining and how well the midsoles hold up is a question of concern. We would rank the Kobe VII above all the shoe you listed. Hope this helps!
about 9 years ago
which ones would you rate first from best to okay: Ts supernatural creator, kd 3, hyperdunk 2011, adizero rose 1, rose 1.5, rose 2, and under armour bloodline? what were the strong points that made the ts supernatural creator so good?
about 9 years ago
Thanks for the support! We would rate the list as follows: (1) Adidas adiZero™ Rose 1, (2) Adidas TS Supernatural Creator, (3) Adidas adiZero™ Rose 1.5, (4) Under Armour Micro G® Bloodline, (5) Adidas adiZero™ Rose 2, (6) Nike Zoom KD III, (7) Nike Zoom Hyperdunk 2011. The strong points of the TS Supernatural Creator include, the Puremotion technology for responsive and fluid play, was well as comfort from the adiprene+. It simply is a great all around performer and is very comfortable on the court. Hope this helps!
about 9 years ago
great review. I’ve been hearing people have had problems with heel slip which surprises me because i haven’t had that problem at all while the VI and V i did. I guess it’s just my foot shape. Would you recommend cutting out the ‘flare’ of the midsoles on the inside of he shoe to prevent blisters? because i was having troubles with that.
about 9 years ago
Thanks foe visiting our site and for the kind words! We would not recommend modifying the shoe in any aspect, as it may void the warranty for them.
about 8 years ago
great review. honest and very very helpful. thanks. keep it up!
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site and for the positive words!
about 8 years ago
Great review and very informative as always!
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site and for the positive comments, it is appreciated!
about 8 years ago
what is the best shoe for a defender?Fly Wade 2,KD4 or Kobe VII or CP3.V
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! Depending on how you play, each pair may offer some advantages. For overall performance, the Jordan Fly Wade 2 or Nike Zoom KD IV may be best for a defensive minded player. Hope this helps!
about 8 years ago
which do you think is better for defensive players adizero rose 2.5 or kobe 7
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! The Adidas adiZero™ Rose 2.5 is a far superior performer than the Nike Zoom Kobe VII in all aspects. Hope this helps!
about 8 years ago
would u rank these above the huarache 2012 bball in overall performance?
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! We have not performed any evaluations on the Huarache 2012 so we can not make a fair assessment.
about 8 years ago
Kobe 7 or Kobe 6?Thanks.
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! For overall performance, the Nike Zoom Kobe VII is a step above the Zoom Kobe VI.
about 8 years ago
Which is more comfortable,more durable and has more value for money, The Kobe 7 or Kobe 6.THANKS>>>
about 8 years ago
The Kobe 7 Play Fast to be exact Sir,Thanks.
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! For comfort, the Kobe VI would be the choice, while durability would go to the Kobe VII. Value would depend on how comfortable you feel in each shoe. Hope this helps!
about 8 years ago
awesome review. I would like to ask which shoe is better, the Kobe VI or the VII in terms of overall performance.
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! We would rate the Zoom Kobe VII over the Zoom Kobe VI.
about 8 years ago
I have kd ivs and I’m a 9.5. What size would I be in kobe 7? Do they run small or big
about 8 years ago
Thanks for the comments! The Nike Zoom Kobe VII does fit a bit snug and similar to the Zoom KD IV. We suggest trying them on and seeing how they feel on your foot. Hope this helps!
about 8 years ago
btw Nice review of kobe zoom VII , i have both kobe VI and VII.. i just observe that that VII is a bit let down in terms of comfort compared to the VI (especially when wearing the play fast isole, zoom air unit is not that responsive vis a vi with the VI). what do you prefer play fast or play strong?
about 8 years ago
Thanks for the positive words! Our evaluations favored the Play Strong, as it added a bit more responsiveness and some ankle support.
about 8 years ago
thanks for the late reply. i agree with your evaluations, but one more question does the zoom units on “attack fast” insole improve overtime?.. thank you very much for your time
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! We are not sure what you mean by improvement, but the midsole itself will break after hours of play. Out of the box, they do have a stiffness to them, so breaking them in is highly recommended. Hope this helps!
about 8 years ago
Hi which is better overall performace kobe 7 or lebron 9? Can you point out their strenghts? Thanks
about 8 years ago
Thanks for the questions! We would rate the Lebron 9 over the Kobe VII. The Kobe VII plays a bit stiff and needs an extended break in period because of the interchangeable midsoles. Once broken in, it brings very good traction. For the Lebron 9, fit and comfort are excellent. On the court, the shoe is very fun to play in. Hope this helps!
about 8 years ago
Hi! I just wanna ask if my Kobe VII Supreme is defective because it doesnt really grip on the indoor court, Is it because it has the XDR or Extra Durable Rubber for Outdoors, I feel like I’m gonna slip. Please Help , Thanks.
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! You may want to contact Nike directly about your problem. Also, the fact that it does not squeak is not an indicator of defectiveness.
about 8 years ago
…. And also it doesn’t squeak, Im afraid i bought a defective pair. Thanks
about 8 years ago
is it true that this shoe is not wearable for people that wear orthotics or other insoles?
about 8 years ago
Thanks for visiting our site! Unfortunately, because the tongue is connected to the interchangeable soles, the shoe does not accommodate other insoles or orthotics.